Monday, September 27, 2010

India's New Generation-Sandwithched between "Baap" and "Beta"

The squeeze is on for Asian families struggling to provide

for children and elderly parents

As people in Asia live longer and women have children later in life, a rising number of adults are simultaneously caring for young children and ageing parents—a phenomenon long recognised in other parts of the world as the growth of the ‘Sandwich Generation’. New research by the Economist Intelligence Unit and sponsored by Fidelity International—Feeling the squeeze: Asia’s Sandwich Generation—shows one in five working-age Asians is now a member of this cohort. These people are typically aged 30 to 45, married, and supporting one or two children and two parents or parents-in-law. The size of the Sandwich Generation varies considerably across regions: in China 37% of the working-age population is supporting multiple generations; in Australia and Japan, only 6% is in this position. Across the region, many members of the Sandwich Generation are squeezed by the financial burden of caring for multiple generations and are concerned that their future living standards will decline.

These findings are among the results of a survey of 700 people in Australia, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan who are currently supporting both their children and their parents. The aim of the survey, which was conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit in March and April 2010, was to ascertain how the burden of supporting parents and children affects the decisions of working-age adults in relation to their disposable income and investment/saving behaviour.

The other key findings of the report are as follows:

  • Asia’s Sandwich Generation is saving for retirement, but many anticipate a reduced standard of living. For the most part, members of Asia’s Sandwich Generation are contributing to public and private pensions or insurance policies, but 42% expect their standard of living to fall once they leave the work force. South Korean and Japanese Sandwich Generation members display the highest level of anxiety about their retirement years. Regardless of their projections for the future, few Asian Sandwich Generation members (just 16%) seek professional advice in financial planning.
  • The Sandwich Generation is working harder, saving less and taking fewer risks with their investments. More than one-third of Asia’s Sandwich Generation members have had to work harder to cover family expenses since becoming “sandwiched”; about half have reduced their savings and investments, and nearly two-thirds are more cautious with their existing investments than they would otherwise be.
  • Many are struggling under the pressure. More than one-third, 36%, of Sandwich Generation members say they are “struggling to cope” with the competing demands of their parents and children. Those in Hong Kong are feeling the most pressure, with 53% of respondents reporting they are struggling to cope.
  • The pressures of supporting parents and children have grown, but dedication to ageing parents remains strong. As longevity has risen and women are having children later, families are simultaneously caring for young children and ageing parents more than in the past. But although the demands may have increased, the Asian Sandwich Generation’s sense of filial obligation remains strong, with 78% agreeing that it is their responsibility to help their ageing parents.
  • Education is a major expense for the Sandwich Generation, but they are willing to pay handsomely for the investment in their children’s future. Asian Sandwich Generation members spend more time and money caring for children than parents, and their children’s education is the primary concern. Educational expenses, which can be considerable, start as early as primary school. Many expect to continue paying for their children into early adulthood: some 58% regionally (and 73% of Sandwich Generation members in Taiwan) say they expect to care for their children into their 20s.
  • Caring for parents can also be expensive, especially where the social safety net is weak. In regions where the elderly often lack pensions or access to public healthcare services, the burden is heavier than elsewhere on Sandwich Generation members to cover their parents’ costs. Sandwich Generation members in China and Hong Kong spend more on their parents than their Asian peers, a result in part of weak social security systems that provide little support for retirees or their families.
Posted by Vidyanand Acharya
Courtsey-EIU Research

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Global Competitve Report 2011

Switzerland tops the overall rankings in The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011, released today by the World Economic Forum ahead of its Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2010 in Tianjin. The United States falls two places to fourth position, overtaken by Sweden (2nd) and Singapore (3rd), after already ceding the top place to Switzerland last year. In addition to the macroeconomic imbalances that have been building up over time, there has been a weakening of the United States’ public and private institutions, as well as lingering concerns about the state of its financial markets. The Nordic countries continue to be well positioned in the ranking, with Sweden, Finland (7th) and Denmark (9th) among the top 10, and with Norway at 14th. Sweden overtakes the US and Singapore this year to be placed 2nd overall. The United Kingdom, after falling in the rankings over recent years, moves back up by one place to 12th position.

The People’s Republic of China (27th) continues to lead the way among large developing economies, improving by two more places this year, and solidifying its place among the top 30. Among the three other BRIC economies, Brazil (58th), India (51st) and Russia (63rd) remain stable. Several Asian economies perform strongly, with Japan (6th) and Hong Kong SAR (11th) also in the top 20. In Latin America, Chile (30th) is the highest ranked country, followed by Panama (53rd) Costa Rica (56th) and Brazil.

Several countries from the Middle East and North Africa region occupy the upper half of the rankings, led by Qatar (17th), Saudi Arabia (21st), Israel (24th), United Arab Emirates (25th), Tunisia (32nd), Kuwait (35th) and Bahrain (37th), with most Gulf States continuing their upward trend of recent years. In sub-Saharan Africa, South Africa (54th) and Mauritius (55th) feature in the top half of the rankings, followed by second-tier best regional performers Namibia (74th), Botswana (76th) and Rwanda (80th). Read the highlights of the report.

- Download the full Global Competitiveness rankings (PDF or Excel format)

Competitiveness Report Rankings 2010-2011

“Policy-makers are struggling with ways of managing the present economic challenges while preparing their economies to perform well in a future economic landscape characterized by uncertainty and shifting balances,” said Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum. “In such a global economic environment, it is more important than ever for countries to put into place the fundamentals underpinning economic growth and development.”

Xavier Sala-i-Martin, Professor of Economics, Columbia University, USA, and co-author of the report, added: “Amid concerns about the outlook for the global economy, policy-makers must not lose sight of long-term competitiveness fundamentals amid short-term challenges. For economies to remain competitive, they must ensure that they have in place those factors driving the productivity enhancements on which their present and future prosperity is built. A competitiveness-supporting economic environment can help national economies to weather business cycle downturns and ensure that the mechanisms enabling solid economic performance going into the future are in place.”

The Global Competitiveness Report’s competitiveness ranking is based on the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), developed for the World Economic Forum by Sala-i-Martin and introduced in 2004. The GCI is based on 12 pillars of competitiveness, providing a comprehensive picture of the competitiveness landscape in countries around the world at all stages of development. The pillars are: institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, higher education and training, goods market efficiency, labour market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, market size, business sophistication, and innovation.

The rankings are calculated from both publicly available data and the Executive Opinion Survey, comprehensive annual survey conducted by the World Economic Forum together with its network of Partner Institutes (leading research institutes and business organizations) in the countries covered by the study. This year, over 13,500 business leaders were polled in 139 economies. The survey is designed to capture a broad range of factors affecting an economy’s business climate. The report also includes comprehensive listings of the main strengths and weaknesses of countries, making it possible to identify key priorities for policy reform.

The report contains an extensive data section with a detailed profile for each of the 139 economies featured in the study, providing a comprehensive summary of the overall position in the rankings, as well as data tables with global rankings for over 110 indicators.

This year’s report also features discussions on selected regions and topics. These include an analysis of the competitiveness of the European Union countries (guest-authored by European Commissioner Joachim Almunia); a review of Latin America’s infrastructure challenges, with a special focus on Brazil; a timely discussion on the relationship between macroeconomic stability and longer-term competitiveness; and the results of the EU Joint Research Centre’s analysis of the GCI, highlighting the statistical robustness and soundness of the index.